then washed the blood off his hands
Here are the key deductions made in the chargesheet:Juvenile’s hands were wet when he left the washroomAmong the witnesses whose statements have been recorded by CBI, 11 are prime witnesses that include the classmates and Brass Fittings For Stainless Steel Bellows Suppliers other students who knew the juvenile.”On the other hand, Sushil Tekriwal, lawyer for the victim, The operative part of the chargesheet is very disappointing, although it appears to be meticulous in context of the juvenile.Juvenile’s cover upWhen CBI questioned the juvenile on what he was doing near the washroom on the ground floor, while his class was on the second floor, he told them that his friend had asked him to wait for him near the water cooler.
When CBI questioned the friend, he revealed that the juvenile called him around 4 pm requesting that in case the police contact him, he should say that he had asked the juvenile to wait for him at the water cooler.Then, after a few seconds, the victim is visible alone in camera 6 entering the washroom gallery at He asked five of his friends to arrange for poisonAnother class 11 student, a friend of the juvenile, has said that he was asked to get a knife or poison by the juvenile as he intended to kill someone, but he refused to comply. He is followed by the juvenile 20 seconds later.“It has been 130 days since the investigation went to the CBI, but it has not yet concluded it.CCTV footageThe chargesheet mentions that CCTV footage from camera number 5 and 6 installed at the school shows the juvenile entering the main gate.The court has not yet taken cognisance of CBI’s chargesheet.
The 2,500-page chargesheet submitted in court uses witnesses, fingerprints, CCTV footage and forensics to establish that the juvenile committed the murder.Yet, as a precautionary measure, he phoned a friend, who he thought may blow his cover, to convince him to not give any statement to the police, if approached. He said he hadn’t yet received the chargesheet, and will go through it once the court takes cognisance. This version was also corroborated by Manoj, a conductor who had gone with them, the chargesheet says.The statements of the students have been recorded before the magistrate and their names have been withheld by ThePrint to protect their identity. The friend, however, refused, and the juvenile landed in trouble, the CBI’s investigation into the murder case has revealed. He said they casually shook hands and that the juvenile’s hands were wet. The friend was summoned by the police for inquiry, and he stated that he neither met the juvenile nor had he asked him to wait for him. The juvenile is then seen at camera 5 at 7:39:38 rushing upstairs.According to CBI, the CCTV footage and statements of witnesses too proved that Ashok did not have any blood on either his hands or clothes, before he lifted the victim to take him to the hospital.
She said the juvenile opened the door and turned towards his left, making a gesture to someone she does not know.The chargesheet also mentions that the juvenile searched for “how to remove fingerprints” online, but did not pursue it as the links pointed to damaging one’s own hand by charring or putting acid.CFSL’s report on fingerprints established that the impression found on the door lock in the toilet in which the victim was murdered is identical with the specimen right thumb impression of the juvenile.New Delhi: The class 11 student who allegedly killed a class 2 student inside the washroom of an international school in Gurugram, on 8 September 2017, went home happy and was relieved to see the news of conductor Ashok Kumar’s arrest on television.CBI’s investigation, however, revealed, that the friend referred to here, entered the school main gate at 7:30:08 hours and was then seen on the second floor on CCTV footage. However, a nurse who had accompanied the victim to the hospital stated that on the way she removed his socks, shoes and opened his belt and button of the knickers to relax him.“‘Bholu’ (as the chargesheet refers to the walking very close to the reception gallery. The CBI has given a clean chit to bus conductor Ashok Kumar, and has slammed the initial investigation by the Gurugram police. It is yet to be seen if the evidence collected by CBI is of good quality or not, which will finally lead to either acquittal or conviction.Juvenile’s fingerprint found on the toilet doorWhen the juvenile was taken into custody, the CBI asked the court for permission to take his fingerprints.“We are yet to be supplied a copy of the chargesheet. It is disappointing that nothing has been mentioned to take action against the police officials who forced Ashok Kumar to confess or the school management and authorities, despite categorical acknowledgement by the CBI regarding their criminal roles.No sexual assaultIn the confession recorded by the police, Ashok said that he had opened the “knikker” (sic) of the victim to sexually assault him.The fingerprints bureau also established that Ashok Kumar’s prints did not match the prints lifted by the Gurugram Police from the scene of the crime. He did not reveal anything about washing his hands (or) using a handkerchief,” the chargesheet says. No seminal stain either was found at the scene of crime, which once against debunked the police theory. They matched with the fingerprints lifted from the scene of crime.While the police claimed that Kumar killed the victim and then washed the blood off his hands and clothes at a water cooler outside, the CFSL report of the crime scene establishes that no trace of blood could be found at any taps, drainage pipes inside the washroom, and at the taps located near the water cooler.The detailed chargesheet submitted to court runs into.